[Also remember that the renowned scholar of pre-Columbian cultures, Dick E. Ibarra Grasso, in his book "Indigenous languages \u200b\u200bof Bolivia", also details the existence of a language or language family "Yuracaré-Moxeño."
The third data quoted another distinguished academic, Mario Montaño Aragón, in his "Bolivian Cultural Anthropology," details only twenty-six languages \u200b\u200bin Bolivia, among which are reported separately from language families "Mojeño" and "Yuracaré." The study did not address evidence of language or dialect "Yuracaré-Mojeño."
"Even the parent document that causes the ethnic divide in Bolivia, the political constitution of the state, includes a tongue-Mojeña Yuracaré among the thirty-six official languages \u200b\u200bof the nations and peasant indigenous peoples," said Columba.] *
N masistoide uevamente the uses and abuse of Santa Cruz community members (unless they do not feel part of the whole Santa Cruz) to manipulate Assembly. It does so from the fraud alleged factual territorial annexations. Who will be told the simple masistoides that cohabitation certain geographical portion between two or more "people" makes it feasible (legally and historically) one day decide to add a simple script (Yuracaré-Mojeña) to self-affirm new people .
Tomorrow will ridicule this practice anexsiva allowing minority communities end up being absorbed (colonized) into more extensive and simple will and political favor.
A risk of possible ridicule of this practice anexsiva - "for script" - is that within ** same capital city Santa Cruz "minorities Western ** * (for the hospitable people of Santa Cruz) installed many of them in ghetto type neighborhoods (La Paz by Jempe.) completed annexations consolidating ridiculous and offensive to the territorial unit of the Department, Bolivia.
What instance is called to address a conflict of such magnitude, according to the constitutional primacy of our legal system? No other instance that the Legislative Assembly, it ordering us, in Article 158 (Multinational Legislative Assembly) (...) 6. Approve the creation of new territorial units and defining their limits, according to the Constitution and the law (...) CPE
Will the masistoide can argue that Yuracaré-Mojeña invention can distinguish the single "seat" (representation) of the inevitable-material-territorial element, it compromises the action of the legislature in a quasi-constitutional aspect?
MASISTOIDE PROMOTES THE DIVISION "dashes" TERRITORIAL UNIT!
______________________
** Imagine what could happen in departmental boundaries.
*** should be quantitatively determine whether they remain "minorities."
0 comments:
Post a Comment