The IRIB pierces masistoide
"The Government of Potosí proposes two options to repatriate Silala waters: drilling or failing to install pumping equipment in various sectors of the vital fluid that travels to Chile. "*
E l centralism is transferring national powers (custodial), about a subject that makes the integrity territory of the country (state security), a sub-level government. For the casual, and more than possible if something goes wrong, you foist blame Potosi department. Centralism in the region seeks to atone **, in the town of San Luis. Of course since he has anger masistoide department, since the APPEASEMENT "monetary compensation" Morales-Bachelet/2009 not held by the nobility of the people.
To this end it is worth noting the constitutional PART TERRITORIAL STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF THE STATE, in its eighth chapter distribution of powers ordering:
[Article 297.
I. Jurisdiction under the Constitution are:
1. Deprivation, those whose legislation, regulation and enforcement can not be transferred or delegated , and are reserved for the central state level.] CPE
Also, to identify the nature (matter) what is intended in the illegal "study repatriation" to project the departmental governance Potosi, partisan and subject to compliance official, include the following offenses:
[Article 298.
I. Are custodial powers of the central state level:
(...) 6. State Security, Defence, Armed Forces and Bolivian police.
(...) 8. Foreign policy.
(...) 10. Border control in relation to state security.
(...) 13. Administration heritage of the Multinational State and public entities central state level.] CPE
perhaps
Consequently, once-illegal-usurping powers entailing *** the central state level, is not projected by the bastard "study" the "drilling" the channel of the river Silala, or alternatively, the "installation of pumping equipment" in the course of the river channel. Ie is it not intended, so violent and wild not only affect diplomatic relations with Chile, but to validate the same medium illegitimate (Violence) by which we were usurped sovereign territories?
However, as required by constitutional law, would not be setting a dangerous precedent for usurpation of powers, to whose effect can easily be affected Bolivia's sovereign interests. Just as it expresses a vulnerability of State Security, the obstruction of the Foreign Policy of the State, the usurpation of powers on the "border control in relation to state security" (taking into account the geographical layout Silala River and its watershed), the State's financial administration (given that the territory is an integrated, space to the assets of the sovereign), among other variables that make the Sovereignty of State Bolivia.
The savage and violent - IPSO FACTO - intended to affect the river Silala will not return to Bolivia's sovereignty usurped territories. What is the background to this to-diplomat, erratic, proceed?
Is not the intention of drilling factual international relations, it also can support to Chile in a possible countersuit?
Is not that wild drilling a plea for the restoration of the belligerent mood among the people of Chile and Bolivia? Remember what were the causes (tax hike and the threat of auction) for the outcome of war, for the Chilean declaration of war "in April 1879.
"To avoid conflict with Chile, we will make a diplomatic move, send the respective notes to the Chilean authorities signed by the Governor and social organizations of the department of Potosi, is all that apply because they must understand there is a historical debt ".****
When the sole purpose projected by masistoide, "b Ombe or excavation" in the riverbed in question, are by no diplomatic or friendly. It is as if the officer thought to invite ridicule their Chilean counterparts to the same wake, through the "notes thereto."
___________________
*/**** http://www.paginasiete.bo/2011-04-08/Nacional/NoticiaPrincipal/ 02Nal01080411.aspx
** In similar note should be noted that l or do not warn former Republican presidents, as well as "other ..." guests, is that the summons masistoide not account , but the thought of as "letters on the manga" for eventual atonement, something go wrong. And enroll in the story, masistoide accommodation as "intellectual authors" of the disaster to the podium Interncional vindicating, and / or spoilage of the International Relations Whatever the medium.
contrario out "something good", that Republicans do not expect the claims to that effect. Because when the hare cries for help ... the fox, just not attend to his aid.
*** It should be noted the fact embezzled that while centralization masistoide acknowledged by pushing social force, the autonomy of state way for a re-zoning Bolivian centralism tends to "delegate" responsibilities as needed, and even out of order constitutional. Made that the delegate centralism, including deleting decree powers (competence) sub-national, believed to be transferring the risk, guilt or liability of the substance or article to be treated by the powers delegated to the respective territorial levels must exercise those powers IPSO FACTO. Such was the case of the late Supreme Decree transferred, regulation (improvised) in transport fares urban, the autonomous departmental and municipal governments; idle and the transfer of duty to increase the percentage balance of prediario local jails, to the departmental governments, on the basis of an impoverished, mean, "increase" the centralist state. Autonomy was devised and put into a deceitful life, only to mask the deficit's and failures of a centralized procedure evicted.
autonomy in itself, beyond being prepared variables in their territorial jurisdiction over the floor in particular is worth adding that under ambiguous terminology synonymous (private and exclusive for example) , as later specified in the Framework Law on Autonomy, ends up being a tool to distance himself vile "centralism" of responsibilities that "competence" is responsible, and possibly even unilaterally. The official centralism, violating his own CPE assumes and / or delegated powers to win and taste of its necessity and political appetite.
However, only the denied despite the legal and political science, there is a principle called subsidiarity . That appears unattainable, incomprehensible to the layman reasoning-centralized, but that argument should have been sufficient and sustainable in different scenarios where they were found the scope of competence. Also the principle of subsidiarity had to "Hypothetically" have been solved in a technical, valuation and impartial as a Constitutional Court, today regrettably reduced to a facet of "liquidating" by inefficient accumulation .
is why reduced autonomy can be seen (hands) to a useful form of "handwashing" or idle centralism political crutch, whenever you discover heated social mood in its failure, inefficiency, and denial historical to the social moment that the country is experiencing.
So ... what to expect but the mule kicks.
