C omo if bad stretch terrorista/Abril-16 self-attack, as improvised as the authors (reason could discover the masistoide AB INITIO hoof after it), is insufficient in its clumsiness, the masistoide not know "to save what little was left" to maintain that his bastard script against people of Santa Cruz, Bolivia spirit *.
The masistoide when you have run (under suspicious circumstances that were expressed in a multitude of expert and impartial studies, many of them international) to its main witnesses (Eduardo Rozsa, Arpad Michael Dwyer and Martin Magyiarosi ), same that could have clarified the government links to the self-coup chivoexpiatoriense, he had been concerned with "the credibility" of "surviving evidence" to hold-in-law his bullshit accusation. But as I warned in my The "advance of the test," the imposture ** , I could point out what the reasons and needs for which the Attorney subscribed to the cause made hearings "advance proof":
[ -generated for themselves, their goals incriminating, an apparent burden of proof;
"And at the same time ensure that the same sources, using the figure of the" advance of trial " , allowed him to manipulate situations and untimely indicia exceptionally, be of simple disposal / destruction. Depending on the needs might be considering a temporary disposal as a final. That is what has served its usefulness, such as compiling information (computer), or provide information statement (person), can be dispensable in later, and as needed obscurentar the ascertainment of legal truth. ]
These reasons and needs, by Order of the ineptitude of the Prosecutor (and generally masistoideismo) assigned to the case, I can now endorse more strongly, as I may demonstrate the events of the "conclusive hearing, which led to a second suspension of the hearing. Hearing is now, strangely , held in the jurisdiction of the city of Cochabamba ***.
[This is the second recess is declared from the beginning of the hearing, on Monday 11. On Tuesday, he stayed because the room was small. Despite this situation, yesterday continued in the same place. Soza said the explosive material was destroyed by hazard and provided photographs that were rejected, as the minutes, and plunged into a discussion with counsel of Guedez .]****
[This is the second recess is declared from the beginning of the hearing, on Monday 11. On Tuesday, he stayed because the room was small. Despite this situation, yesterday continued in the same place. Soza said the explosive material was destroyed by hazard and provided photographs that were rejected, as the minutes, and plunged into a discussion with counsel of Guedez .]****
Now let go of that of supposed pinnacle of evidence, in this case, there are three categories or types of elements of "burden of proof"
Documents -general stationery.
-Artifacts electronics.
-explosive materials and military hardware.
So why the Prosecutor persecutor of the case, argued ironically (as allowed to check newspaper archives documented the statements in open court) that the absence of the evidence must be (opportunistically) to:
- "that are heavy for their transfer."
- and, in turn, also mentioned that they were "destroyed."
The inconsistent crutch that the material elements "were destroyed" by "dangerous" or not, and even more, with no certainty about what (the minutes and other devices are inadequate, given the irregular proceeding ) elements were destroyed, does not relieve the Tax respond that their unilateral and untimely disposal of the evidence.
Same irresponsible to proceed in contravention biased:
| ||
| evidentiary lack any acts that violate rights and guarantees enshrined in the Constitution of the State, international conventions and treaties in force, this Code and other laws of the Republic, as well as evidence obtained through information originating in a procedure or unlawful means. not have probative value the evidence into the process without observing the formalities prescribed in this Code.] CPP |
To this end, what will happen to the Prosecutor presented as possible "finding" that what "destroyed" and / or what "no show" on the occasion of the process, it is for absolute subject to the stipulations of the criminal procedural-cited budget. Since, the supposedly "found in the record" or other media (copy / photos) for their inefficiency and substantial objective, (...) violate the rights and guarantees enshrined in the Constitution of the State "of the accused, as well as shape (easily)-A POST-like (...) evidence obtained through information originating in a procedure or unlawful means. " Surely, masistoide warned of this defect in his self-attack to proceed, even brings up "evidence" too much.
Finally the evidence that will weigh at masistoide, against its entire planning improvised self-atentoria, falls not ripe, but rotting. Fortunately for the truth, the crime is often agreeing with the cultural level of offenders, as a social phenomenon, and that's before us is easy or difficult to detect improvised filth which hatched masistoides the props of their self-attack implicatory of dissident voices.
_____________________ * While organizing masistoide singled out certain individuals and institutions Santa Cruz, should be clear that the same union at the time represented either by their position, leadership and do in general, the entire people of Santa Cruz. Hence the centrality masistoide complaints, indictments and pursuing the great majority of the people of Santa Cruz, represented in their persons, authorities, and regional institutions. That, and the effect of having politicized the masistoide the ultimate motivation behind its planned assault in eastern Bolivia. The cohesion of the people of Santa Cruz, Bolivia spirit, must take the shame of the parasite masistoide, as only "united force" to such social obscurantism.
The masistoide alien and alienated social critic of Bolivian deep in vindictive, and wild courage, should be chastened with the full weight of history.
*** Highlight masistoide as very strange fact that (again) violated the natural jurisdiction the process, illegally at first established in the jurisdiction of the city \u200b\u200bof La Paz. Since only the jurisdiction to jurisdiction to the attention of that case was, is and will remain the jurisdiction of the city of Santa Cruz. And that in turn keeps current claim by the respondents, the "procedural default whatsoever," under l conflict over competition for judicial review from the courts of the cities of La Paz and Santa Cruz .
0 comments:
Post a Comment